Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HADIAT versus SADIQ ALI CHAUDHRY

Section 115 and AXLI, R 27 Request for a Review The respondent's permission was granted to the respondents before the preparation of additional evidence. A respondent had requested that the former decision be kept aside. Is praying for because it was never presented and was told that the respondent's request was accepted and the former party order was set aside. The former party's decision was based on the fact that the individual in question was an authoritative document, which should have been admitted in evidence by the appellate court, in the absence of the applicant's respondent, where his service Was not done If the defendant had appeared and his lawyer had objected to the authenticity of the disputed person split, it would have been appropriate, if the appellate order had been rejected, the High Court had directed the appellate court to apply for additional evidence first. Decide, the order of the appellant by the applicants was determined with the observations that the appellate court would decide the appeal o ict filed by the applicants under XLI; R 27, CPC and thereafter the appeal. Redo the decision law firms from Bewal lawyer