Find a Lawyer

SAEED KHALID versus NAZIR AHMED

A. XLI, R 27 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 8 Suit Additional Evidence, Order of Preparation of Suit for Occupation of Property has been ordered by the defendants against the judgment and injunction against the trial court's defendants. On appeal, the application was moved to prepare additional evidence for the submission of three documents, namely, in one of the statements made by the plaintiff in the previous suit, which the plaintiff allegedly admitted. That its suit is not a different property number than the property number. ; Defendant's plea in the case was dismissed in the trial court's ruling on the alleged transfer of suit property and the decision of the plaintiff could not prove that in the earlier case which was related to different property numbers, The dispute related to the property included in the judicial decision was part of the judicial record which came into existence after the trial court's decision and decree approval, and the decision was related to resolving the statement by one of the plaintiffs. I was quoted in the property, which was declared. Documents purchased by the defendants through the court which have been relevant, should have been allowed by the court as well as the decision of the civil court and the decision was binding on the defendants, who were not parties to the lease. Either the defendant's predecessor made the purchase or not. Properly tailoring the property to the person who had the title to the sale of the property will have questions to resolve. The court's review was partially granted to the defendants to the extent that the additional evidence As f top advocate from Taxila lawyer