MESSRS NIZAM CERAMICS INDUSTRIES, G.T. ROAD, GUJRANWALA THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR
Section average42 The tampering with the litigation meter for the declared bill on an average basis was that the natural gas meter on its premises added extra money to its bill without accusation of some error. The gas company's position was that the meter was tampered with. The appellate court dismissed the case as well as the trial court with unregulated gas supply, and the appeal filed by the plaintiff by the plaintiff was that the company could only charge for 15 days, so that That no evidence was available on the plaintiff's affidavit. In no way was the liability for the alleged error in the recording of the meter or any other way the adjustment could be made for only 15 days, while the company had made the adjustment for 107 days. Violation was, even if it was assumed that something was wrong with the company. The company failed to prove any defect in the meter. The High Court directed the company to serve the plaintiff with the bill prepared by the contract. However, the decisions passed by the two courts below were set aside and the case was dismissed accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Kamber Ali Khan lawyer