RASHID MEHMOOD versus STATE
Sections 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 452, 148 and 149 Guarantees, no one was hurt and the role attributed to him during the alleged investigation of the accused. The FIR was respected. The allegations of ineffective firing against the accused in the FIR were, in general and collective terms, and did not specifically mention the pistol, though during the investigation of the case, the accused was taken into custody. It was allegedly recovered, but there was nothing. Export pistol is available on record to link to alleged crimes After the completion of the investigation, the invoice was already presented, continuing the detention of the accused in the jail was unlikely to serve any useful purpose, Case against accused seeking further inquiry into crime, accused confessed on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Naukundi lawyer