Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AWAIS versus MUHAMMAD. JAVED IQBAL

The plaintiff paid the plaintiff's father Rs.2 million by way of a lawsuit for the declaration and recovery of the Sections 10 and 42 trust-proof plaint, after which the trust's father died and the defendant returned the money to the plaintiff. Declared and requested receipt of the disputed amount, the trial court dismissed the case, which was retained in the first appeal, citing the document as "anonymity", in evidence. Could not be allowed to tender. After the approval of the check issued by the plaintiff's account, his account, however, was defendant's defense, stating that the deceased had paid the plaintiff a loan amounting to two hundred thousand rupees, The source was returned to the deceased by the plaintiff by check and transferred to the deceased account The deceased was the head clerk in the settlement department, his monthly holidays were not more than Rs 7/8 thousand and he was named as corruption. There was no evidence on the record of the victim's financial ability to borrow such a large sum of money. I've proof was in the fact that the debt exists. The plaintiff proved her case by providing oral and documentary evidence by the plaintiff and the plaintiff refused to answer that her father had paid two million rupees in debt to the plaintiff and she was the defendant. Ali had taken it. His father used to sell and buy property, as was always a part-time job and in large quantities in his account, as requested in his written statement. law websites from Chowk Maitla lawyer