IJAZ ALI versus STATE
Section 498 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), bail before section 324 arrest, refusal to file FIR immediately, no time was left for the complainant to consult, it was alleged, in this case in the circumstances Could not have been wrongly involved, especially as the incident was a one-day incident and was also witnessed by two lawyers, who recorded their statements under Section 161, to the CRPC for the crime. The accused involved in the commission were named in the FIR and claimed on the specific role of firing on the complainant. On the occasion of his presence, which was assisted in the recovery of five vacant 30 bore pistols, in which the complainant was riding at the time of the incident, the police had taken him into custody. Failure to appear, on the date when this plea for bail was confirmed, such behavior of the defendants prevented them from allowing the unusual pre-arrest exception. The accused was not charged with false interference in the case against the complainant or the police, especially in the case which was not based on any concrete material prima under section 242424, not bound in court. Was. , Attracted the case of the PPC accused, sentenced to 10 years imprisonment, was subjected to the prohibition clause of section 497, to present a case for extraordinary bail privileges before the CCP accused. I was unsuccessful, bail was dropped
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Qambar lawyer