Find a Lawyer

CHAIRMAN, WAPDA, LAHORE AND ANOTHER versus MAHMOOD AHMAD

Section 4 Water and Power Development Authority Promotion Policy, Clause 10 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Promotion, Denial of Promotion of Principal Authorities In the history of development and deployment of employee's seniority was denied. But the service tribunal allowed their appeal to be validated. The employee was deemed fit for development and requested tariff development for his development, but he was found to be under Article 10 of the Impact Rule and Power Development Authority Promotion Policy. B) was promoted immediately, if the employee's annual secret report was dossier, it could be deferred for development. Incomplete or disciplinary proceedings pending against him were in breach of Article 10 (b) of the Employees' Suppression Water and Power Development Authority Promotion Policy. The employee could only be postponed for promotion and should not be denied service. The decision passed by the tribunal was correct. And according to the proper reasons, neither the Supreme Court nor the law enacted by them, there was no misunderstanding again, neither the lack of material evidence nor the importance of the common people about the facts and the wrong structures of the law. Was not included in the question as contemplated under Article 1212 (3) of the Constitution, the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the decision passed by the service tribunal. Was denied top civil advocates from Shahdad Pur lawyer