Find a Lawyer

MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK versus SHAMSUL AULIA

Sections 25A, 46, 47 (3) and 48 of the Complaint application neglect the cashier's knowledge of dismissal at the bank, the receipt of checks by the cashier without obtaining the signature and confirming the identity of the identifier. The charge, which presented to the bank, caused the loss of a check due to the cash court's refusal of the cashier's complaint by the Labor Appellate Tribunal to the bank through the Labor Appellate Tribunal to the cashier by the High Court. In the wake of such an allegation against the reinstatement of the service, the Validatio Tribunal dismissed the appeal, Was offered. Beginning with the nature of the charge, the slightest penalty for stopping two additions with no collective effect for two years will be sufficient to meet the end of justice. immigration advocates from Dadakhel lawyer