SYED SAJJAD HAIDER KAZMI versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL (S&GAD) WAPDA
Sections 3, 5 and 10 Service fire at hospital forced to retire Government employee accused of wrongdoing of fire alarm system at hospital. Implementation of such fine after transfer with regular inquiry Recruitment from employment to employment Retirement 9 10 2006 to 12 10 2006 On obtaining the age of the sub-service tribunal, a civil servant is directed to conduct a de novo inquiry against him. A copy of the preliminary inquiry report was not made available to the partially approved appeal public servant, leaving him unknowingly. Due to a public accusation, the employee was not given a personal hearing. The preliminary inquiry could not be made a regular inquiry and should not have been conducted in the wake of controversies and controversial issues raised by public servants. Reason for responding to the notice was not authorized by the competent authority. After applying the mind, the civil servant has retired, conducting a de novo inquiry against him in the absence of any legal justification. No, the Supreme Court put aside the unclean decision in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
