Find a Lawyer

HAROON versus STATE

Prohibition of Sections 7 (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 337 F (ii), 337 L (2) and 353 Prohibition of Prohibition in Prohibition of Firing at the Raiding Party during Probationary SB Recovery The presence was disclosed, but the raiding party said that the house neither arrested nor showed the accused in this case. SB was not presented as a witness in the case, which was done by the motorcycle owner on a motorcycle. The accused was disclosed to the accused, meaning that I was neither examined nor arrested as a witness. Since one of the suspects had recovered a motorcycle from the scene, witnesses said that the suspect fired a pistol at the injured person, but this person has been discharged from the presence of two gunshot wounds. The injured constable was fired from a pistol. But medical evidence suggests that there were no holes in his shirt and shalwar even until the blood of the injured policemen was found in the police custody, without any suspicion by the prosecution to prove his case. Had failed, the Supreme Court had sentenced and punished. The trial court acquitted the accused and the High Court certified accused pakistani advocates Mandra lawyer