Find a Lawyer

MAHBOOB ALAM versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB, THROUGH SECRETARY, EDUCATION, LAHORE

The plaintiffs announced the land acquisition of the Para-Special Relief Act (in 1877), section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), sections 42 and 53 of the national schools. Plaintiffs' lawsuit filed by plaintiffs in favor of the government dismisses the allegation of being their owner. The trial court-plea raised by the defendants stated that the land was illegally occupied by the plaintiff in the dispute. And mutations were recorded behind their backs, which were never demanded and no notice was taken. Accuracy simply because under the terms of paragraph 5 of Martial Law Regulation No. 118, privately administered schools had to be vested in the government along with their assets, this did not mean that the government was concerned with the ownership of buildings. Where schools or colleges are being run. Martial Law Regulation No. 118 was explicitly the sole responsibility of administering the institution, nor was there any evidence presented by the administration to confiscate the property, which shows that the possession of the school under the Martial Law Regulation No. 118 At the time, the school involved in the dispute was owned by the school, records show that the land was owned by the defendants' father. And upon his death, he was transferred through a legacy change which disputed the land was wrongly renamed in the name of the provincial government, which was believed to be the property of the school or the property of the provincial government. ? In the absence of any tangible evidence, this mutation could, therefore, be construed as necessary under section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967. criminal advocate from Gakhar Mandi lawyer