Find a Lawyer

MST. SALLAH KHATOON versus SULTAN

Defendants challenged the change of water outlet change affecting defendants' application through a declaration suit that the Superintendent Canal Officer did not provide legal reasons for denying his appeal jurisdiction, though it has been proven That Moga has been replaced by an old shop. The new outlet is detrimental to the climate interests of the owners of the land, the trial court ruled in the case and the order was upheld in the appeal. The Canal officer and the sub divisional officer, the accuracy superintendent, appeared as witnesses, unable to deny that the old shop was in working condition while the new outlet was not only out. But it was also located 100 feet away from the order, where witnesses from the shop trying to convert admitted that from 1952, 420 acres of land had been irrigated by the old shop and that the rectangle was rectangular (No. 5) Will happen. The out-of-command report clearly shows that the entire arrangement was full of irreversible irreversible, while a new change would result in the arrears of the land being cleared, with the Canal Department being located at a higher place. The field map from the district officer's records also confirmed that according to the situation, the order of the Divisional Canal Officer has been approved to fix the new outlet. The co-sharers but the statements of the defendants, who were also co-operatives in the mill, were not signed by some other landowners and they did not agree to the change in the shop requested by the defendants. The decisions have revealed that the old shop has changed. Blazers and cleverness best advocate from Barbar Loi lawyer