MUHAMMAD SOHAIL BUTT versus CAPITAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Sections 2 (21), 148 and 152 wording, as used in section 148 of the Companies' Ordinance, 1984 Conduct Dry Port Trust, a person filing a trust notice on the register of members, the defendant's company Correction of the register of members was sought by the applicant as a shareholder / member company of the respondent company raised by the applicant `Dry Port Trust name 'was an attempt to annul the Dry. The Port Trust was not a legal entity, so the defendant for the Dry Port Trust could not be a part of the company. A law firm, registered with the trust, was authorized to invest in the stock and was used by Section 148 of the Company's Ordinance 1984, a member of the company responsible for the relationship of Company Trustee, Trustee and Sistoi. Was able to become. The provisions of section 148 of the Ordinance of Companies, registered under the Companies Trust Act 1879 and the Companies Act made under Trust Act 188, were constituted by the Qui Trust, the definition of a person entered into the Dry Port Trust and he entered into a company. The only restriction was when the trust failed to prevent or forbid the trust from becoming a member / shareholder in a company, which could be trusted if the terms were imposed. Become a member, subject to such conditions, the applicant failed to file a case for correction of the company's member register, the applications were dismissed in the circumstances. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
