MESSRS A.I. BROTHERS (PVT.) LTD. versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
The contention was that BPD Circular No. 29 of 2002 applied to the appellant, the trial court erroneously concluded that the appellant was not entitled to its benefits due to the failure to pay the required 10%. It argued that the failure to pay was not for the appellants but for the respondents, who made the false claim that the appellants were not entitled to the benefits of the circular in the context of the question, being the first appeal against the judgment and injunction. Was needed. Confession to hear
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
