Find a Lawyer

GHULAM QADIR PATNI versus STATE

Sections 7 (a) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 (b), 324, 392 and 353 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (e) of the Convention on the Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Arts 122 And 129, illusion (a) appreciating the evidence cannot be doubted in the presence of a witness at the scene of the incident because he suffered injuries to his own person, with no evidence of any hostility to the accused's witnesses. Agreed. Contradictions and contradictions Ocular testimony was natural and details of the incident were found on the SMG produced by the suspect in the three empty pellet shells, and it was established that the suspect produced the SMG. It was the SMG who was carrying the deceased with the deceased at the time of the incident and the accused was taken away and then the victim was fired on him, thus under Article 122 of the Law in Martyrdom Order, 1984. The accused was linked to the commission of the crime, it was necessary to prove ci an error under which he was sent to the SMG in the bedroom of his house. Learned about ujudgy, but he failed to do so, the SMG was looted property developed by a suspect and they either receive bandits had looted property. Examples (a) of Article 129 of the Law Evidence Order, 1984, unless they account for their seizure, but in this regard it did not provide any explanation and the required speculation was made against it and The robbery and murder of the SMG were committed in the same case in which a section of the transaction was made, the SMG was robbed, therefore, as evidence of perjury against the accused in the robbery and murder charges. advocates from Kurram lawyer