Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL SIDDIQUI versus PROVINCE OF SINDH, MINISTERY OF FOOD AND COOPERATION

Article 199 Constitutional Petition Maintenance Petitioner had already requested the jurisdiction of the Civil Court to be able to decide all the questions involved in the matter. Applicants had already benefited from the treatment available under the law. The first remedy available under the law should be abolished and then a constitutional application should be filed, but if this remedy was not appropriate and effective, then the High Court could be referred to. As such, he could not request the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, however, the existence of an alternative was not restricted to the issuance of an order under Article 199 of the Constitution; Should be sufficient to guarantee denial. Using the constitutional jurisdiction by the High Court and it was also important that the second remedy should also be special and sufficient in the sense that it should be capable of raising relief on the issue of the application and equally easy, beneficial and To be effective, the situation was quite different in the present case as the applicant had already benefited. Four years after the civil suit was filed in a court of competent jurisdiction and its constitutional application was dismissed, it was dismissed. immigration advocates from Hazro lawyer