QUTUBUDDIN versus STATE
Section 265A and 540 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Re-examining witnesses without the presence of a public prosecutor Public prosecutor and that the trial court itself declared the public prosecutor's case to be murder. The presence of a public prosecutor was very important at the time of writing the statements of the court and if the public prosecutor was not available to the court, it was the presiding officer's duty. To take the loan of another Public Prosecutor of the Sessions Court, but this was not done, the Assistant Advocate General appearing for the State agreed with the sentence taken by the petitioner's lawyer and if he Allowed to be reviewed and directed to the trial court to state that the doctors did not consider the trial court for examination / re-examination, especially in Section 265A, CR, PC. When it was a case of murder, the trial court was set aside, the trial court was instructed to summon both doctors and They will be summoned again with the help of a government lawyer.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Mandra lawyer