Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM SAKINA versus STATE


Section 497 (2) of the Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 17 and 22 guarantees, further investigation grants were provided by the complainant with no date or even month by month while the accused was liable for filing a case against the complainant. The accused was the CO CO-accused, an old man and a blind man, who allegedly disclosed payment receipts, was declared an innocent backdrop of animosity between the complainant and the accused, in the FIR to bring charges against the accused. The accused, in need of further investigation, was entitled to bail if the accused woman was, in addition, the accused in prison. Was subjected to bail and no further physical custody was required, the accused was admitted on bail, under conditions

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.