COMMERCIAL ADVERTISERS THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER versus TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SARGODHA
Sections 44 (1) and 191 Punjab Local Government (Auction of collection rights) Rules, 2003, Rule 2 and 5 (5) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Publicity Board Auction of Taxes, the name of the affected person Auction bid failed due to unsuccessful bidder bidding that no specific price was mentioned in the post and being the highest bidder was not eligible to participate in the action. Although no specific price was mentioned in the post, the applicant did not receive any prejudice. At this point, as prices were posted on the notice board of the authorities and announced before the auction proceedings, the copy was distributed to all bidders, any person, firm or company in Punjab. Local was eligible under KR2. Government (Collection Rights Auction) Rules, 2003, to bargain with the local government; therefore, most bidders were disqualified by the High Court for their participation in the auction proceedings. Refused to interfere with the auction proceedings
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
