Find a Lawyer

HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION versus KARIM BAKHSH

Claim for the supply and sale of mortgaged property that the petitioner had brought under section 30 of the Appellant Corporation House Building Finance Corporation Act 1952, for the supply and sale of possession of the mortgaged property. It has been reported that payment of monthly installment has been erroneous despite respondent's issuance. On the legal notice the appellant alleged that, on the defendant's violation of the terms and conditions of the mortgage agreement, the appellant was entitled to recover the entire loan amount from the respondents. The defendant filed a petition, stating that he had made some payments to the corporation, which did not adjust the statement of the trial court's accounts, considering the receipts offered by the respondents. It was reported that some money had been deposited by the respondents, which was not carefully deducted and so on. HK deduction was changed. The corporation could not make a statement in favor of the corporation, proving that the amount paid by the recipient through the receipt was adjusted in the statement of accounts; in the absence of entry in the statement of accounts, the trial court had, to a reasonable extent, The case was deducted that it was paid by the defendant. Of the trial court list of advocates from Dadu lawyer