Find a Lawyer

ASGHAR ALI versus STATE

Sections 514 (XLV of 1860), sections 337A (i) and (ii) were charged with reducing the amount of confiscatory fines of the bailiffs for which the applicant failed to appear in court on bail. The accused's bail was granted, the applicant was burdened with paying bail, it was alleged that he had committed a crime which does not fall under the prohibition clause of section 497, CRP The accused for whom the applicant bailed, appeared in the trial court on the number of cases, the applicant was not provided with the appropriate opportunity. Submit your response to the court-issued showcase notice and the applicant was first asked to submit a written response to the showcase notice on the date the applicant was postponed, in which case the bail of the accused officer will be guaranteed. Was based on humanitarian sympathy and had no financial benefit in that the applicant was sincerely trying his best to present the accused, but was not dealt with by law enforcement. In this regard, the order to seize the amount of bail was a bit stringent and in the circumstances of this case, by application Partial fines were allowed to be reduced from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 25000 which would be paid by the applicant within the stipulated period. us immigration advocates from Goular Khel lawyer