Find a Lawyer

GHULAM QADIR versus SUPERINTENDING CANAL OFFICER, NILI BAR CIRCLE, SAHIWAL

Article 20 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition to move an applicant from a remote area to another applicant, was the owner of agricultural land, by the relevant out-petitioner due to the length of the water course and other factors. Was not properly irrigated. Circumstances applied to the Divisional Canal Officer under section 20 of the Canal and Drainage Act, 1873, to transfer the area to the Divisional Canal Officer. Officer Superintendent Canal Officer said that the recommendations were not confirmed, and the same clause was expressly rejected under section 20 of the Canal and Sewerage Act, 1873; the Superintendent Canal Officer had the authority to verify or modify the decision of the Divisional Canal Officer. But he said that the department has no authority. Reject an open decision on the Divisional Canal Officer's Superintendent Canal Officer, only the Divisional Canal Officer can make or change the order, the Impeded Order approved by the Superintendent Canal Officer, after a High Court hearing of the petitioner pursuant to a law. Was set with the instructions to pass. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kotri lawyer