SYED GHAUS BAKHSH versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR
A. XLI, R 33 Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894), Section 18 Appellate Court Power was not satisfied as a relief appellant landlord to the non-appealing parties, and the court referenced a preferential reference to the court. Did not maintain the compensation. An order by the referee court filed an appeal before the High Court in which the entire award was set aside and the compensation was increased by the appellants requesting the execution of the order passed by the High Court. Filed If any appeal is filed before the High Court and the decision of the Referee Court is accepted, in the interest of justice, under the jurisdiction of the court, non-appealing parties are allowed appropriate relief, where the appeal was present, throughout the decree. There was a lot of discretion about this. O XLI, R 33, was granted to the appellate court in terms of CPC so as to prevent the end of justice from being defeated, the High Court set aside the executive court's order as the appellants were entitled to their limitation. Are entitled to recover as long as the appeal was allowed according to the judgment presented in the High Court decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Samma Satta lawyer