Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 353, 224, 225, 324, 337a (i), 148 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the benefit of doubtful FIR of the definition of Section 7 evidence, on which the incident was based Neither was he taken into custody during the investigation presented, nor was he kept on record in front of the trial court police during the trial, without the purpose of guaranteeing his arrest, The arrest was raided, the medical evidence, clearly in the confrontation with the prosecution witnesses ocular. The story, not sure, in its statements under Section 342 was presented by the accused in the defense, CRPC feels that the alleged injuries to the constable's person were fabricated so that The witnesses of the incident could have been. The accused did not know the suspect before the incident, and the mention of their names in the written complaint proved that the FIR was recorded after deliberation. Was given the benefit of and they got worse under the circumstances famous high court advocate from Badin lawyer