Find a Lawyer

RIFFAT IQBAL versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MANDI BAHAUDDIN

Sections 148, 149, 151, 115 and OVI, R11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for filing a suit through a prior notice and claiming reduction of court fees, under trial The applicant was instructed to make good. Application to meet the reduction of court fees for filing an application under Sections 148, 149 and 151, CPC, by the applicant of a specific date on the last day, which application was accepted Was, the applicant's claimant was dismissed under OVII, R 11. The CPC rejected the applicant's case and filed a constitutional petition against the order approved in the review. The applicant's stance cannot be considered as a reason for the extension of time due to a good making up of judicial fees under Sections 148, 149 and 151. , Especially when it was not endorsed by a documentary evidence, under the law, the defendant determined the valuable rights, by the trial court, to improve the fee reduction in court due to the applicant's error. Have been imposed on aliens that cannot be snatched away without giving a proper purpose and giving them the opportunity to enter or hear an answer. , CPC, the petitioner's request could not be accepted by any sketch / impugned order which deprives the defendants of their rights, which they applied after the trial court extended the extension period. Was calculated by default. Except for the review jurisdiction under Section 115, the CPC where Liss is properly appointed family advocate from Shahkot lawyer