Find a Lawyer

MST. SURRIYA PARVEEN versus MUZAFFAR ISLAM MALIK

Sections 12 and 27 (b) for consideration consider the specific performance of the contract to sell to BuenaFeeder buyers, on the basis of a sale agreement between the plaintiff and the Capital Development Authority, allotted to the plaintiff in the dispute. , Which was being erected by the construction authority's licensees, failed to complete the construction as per the license plan. Thus, the plaintiff ceased to pay installments as per the contract. Authority canceled, after the plot was canceled in the name of the plaintiff, the plaintiff, Raise the merit, demanding the specific performance of the contract to sell it, which the trial court rejected in favor of recovering the amount paid by it, but the lower appellate court ruled in that order. Edit and claimant found The High Court approved by the lower appellate court, entitled the dispute judgment and the acquisition of the plot in December, took care of the plaque taken by the plaintiff that it was a clear allotment of the plot built on it and maintained its control. Was entitled to hold the first plot under question was allotted in favor of the plaintiff. Whose plot was paid to the Capital Development Authority, which was contracted between the Authority and the Plaintiff, which was registered and the physical possession was handed over, the Plaintiff obtained approval from the House Building Finance Corporation. After which he had to perform all the necessary formal operations. The allotment of physical possession was confirmed by the Capital Development Authority and the Authority cancels the plot. property advocates from Khyber Agency lawyer