Find a Lawyer

MST. HAZAN AND 48 OTHERS versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN

Paragraph 21 (1) and (2) of the jurisdiction of retaining the jagirs by the jagirs as jagirs, the lands of the appellants were returned to the government but the applicants are not allowed to retain any piece of land as M. Paragraph 21 (2) of the legitimate appellant of LR No. 64 provided. Or at the time, his predecessors in the interests were listed in the Record of Rights, because the landlord and the property in dispute were not subject to the assessment of land revenue, so the High Court correctly stated that the property was in dispute. And under paragraph 21 (1), 64 of 1959, MLR, it automatically terminated and, from 310 1959, under paragraph 21 (2) of MLR No. 64, received in favor of these persons. Have been returned to the government free of any hindrance or allegations, under the appropriate rights. Landlords / grants etc. were abolished and returned to the State Land Reform Authorities; the authorities have a duty to determine whether the appellant or his predecessor is in the interest, whether or not they were entitled to the benefits at the relevant time. No such matter was so far taken by any authority so far as it was not found that even under para 21 (2) of MLR No. 64, the appellant or persons in his interest Not able to exclude any area from their jagirs because they were owners or possessed. Benefits were automatically granted to all such landlords and MLRs to prevent them from claiming any leverage over 500 acres of irrigated land or 36000 production index units other than landed suburbs. Para 21 (2) of No. 64 provides for self-explanation online advocate from Zahir Pir lawyer