PROVINCE OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY EXCISE & TAXATION DEPARTMENT, QUETTA versus MURREE BREWERY COMPANY LTD. THROUGH SECRETARY
Article 62 British Balochistan Foreign Wine and Country Spirit Regulations, 1947, R4 (4) [as amended by Notification No. SO (E&T) 234 Tax / 99/769 78, dated 20 8 1999] The provincial government has imposed special costs on constitutional plea before the High Court Maintenance Liability Standards, 1980, AXXVIII, R Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 (1). Import fees were imposed on all liquor supplies. Notification on the basis that Notification No. SO (E&T) 234 Taxes / 99/769 78, dated 20 8 1999, in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction issued by the Government of Balochistan, compared to the companies located in the Balochistan High Court. The defendant was placed in an inappropriate location. The petition filed by the petitioner was allowed and the notification without notification of legal authority was declared as a notification that the question was raised by the authorities that the respondent was not a provocative person under Article 199 (1). Therefore, there was no Lux Standi to apply in the Constitution. The Corrective Responder failed to show that it was an outrageous party because it was not charged a fee and had never paid the same liability company that was never one of the licensors. The market has complained of a decline in the value of its product sales because of a rise in prices and the resulting increase, or because one of them refused to supply the product to the third party ( Licenses) for which he was responsible. duty /
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
