GHULAM QADIR versus KALAY KHAN
Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) by the trial court, by hanging the suit for the specific performance of the contract for the sale of the applicants, in the interest of the defendants. Was dismissed, but the Appellate Court upheld the petitioner's revised decision filed by the respondents against the Appellate Court decision, thereby restoring the trial court's decision to dismiss the applicant's claim. Was explicitly stated that no sale was granted in his presence and They also did not know that the executor of the contract did not comply with the requirements of the law to prove the alleged sale agreement to the High Court, which would have resulted in the reversal of the appellate court's decision. Regardless of the reasons. High Court had to suffer from misreading and non-reading of material evidence on the record. The High Court's decision to come to another conclusion was clearly a valid decision for which there was no exception. Can be taken
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Tharparkar lawyer