Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SULMAN HAIDER versus STATE


Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 161 and 34 of the Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) unlawfully agreeing to the guarantee of a public servant, the accused's denial-team in the hands of the accused caught. Three to four people were found in the occupied currency from the possession of the accused, which aspect was not denied by the accused's lawyer. No doubt, the accused was not mentioned in the name FIR, but a special role was assigned to him, who had already added him to the commission of the crime, when questioned about the tainted money. No appreciable explanation can be offered by the accused. Deep testimony of the money evidence was not valid, and the court only had to conduct a temporary review. There was no case of interference. given

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Hattian lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.