Section 6 37ape Advantage of Evidence Due to Rape Inquiry Evidence Case Failure to Support the FIR Effect of Evidence Based on Evidence of Evidence Testimony Before her father / complainant sued all witnesses before committing suicide Because they did not identify the accused in court and said they could not say that the accused was the person whose name was pronounced guilty by the deceased victim trial court and raped on the basis of the evidence of the esteemed witnesses. The accused who committed the crime was convicted after observing that the evidence of such witnesses was prosecuted on material points. Support the case, it was legitimate to rely on it. The incident allegedly happened but the complaining party had tried to rescue the accused after a compromise between the two parties, and the complainant had admitted in several tests that the victim had committed the crime before committing suicide. The name of the person was revealed. All the prosecution's witnesses were filed as admissible complainants before the trial court, stating that they did not intend to proceed with the case, but the trial court still based on the evidence of the opposing witnesses. The accused was convicted. In the FIR, but during his statement, he stated that he saw a man with a face and gave the suspect the name of the suspect, the statement of the victim because of his suicide could not be recorded. , So there is no significant value in the ocular account The prosecution was not brought. The sufficient evidence on record to justify the conviction of the accused was contradictory to the ocular evidence ial evidence trial
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
