MUHAMMAD ZAMAN versus FAUZIA BIBI
Article 5 and Schedule Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VIII, Rr. 1 and 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application. To do The court did not commit the error of law by choosing to follow the procedure laid down for the civil suit case but to file a statement under Rule 1 of OVIII along with this procedure. Following a CPC term, the ruling after the CPC disclosed that the Judge Family Court demonstrated unnecessary haste at the expense of providing justice through the approval of the order within a period of 20 days. Should have provided an appropriate opportunity to defend, not just another opportunity to file a written statement. Justice, however, could also complete a period of one month, as the rule enjoined the patent from violating unlawful deeds. y The High Court directed the Family Court to allow only one last opportunity for the claimant to file his written statement with costs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Dadakhel lawyer