Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF ALIAS MAHI versus STATE

The testimony of section 2 30b (b) was non-testimony of the incident, and when the body of the victim was recovered, the police were immediately notified when it was last seen that his father and his mother's mother had submitted, But dishonest improvement in their evidence was sufficient to reject their testimony allegedly by the accused, evidence of extra-judicial confessions made before the prosecution's witness, whose evidence was confirmed by the remaining four defendants. And the evidence was not confirmed, the recovery of the two burglaries took place about one month and sixteen days after the incident. The police constable, no other person in the area was involved in the recovery process, said that the witnesses to the knives did not say in their statement under Section 161, CRPC that they were stained with the blood of the knives here. Unless otherwise delayed in the recovery, he said that the Knife Examiner and serologist was obliged to disperse reports of knives, chemi's blood, there was no result, the prosecution was able to prove his case against the accused without any doubt. I was unsuccessful, his trial and sentence could not be sustained through trial, the judgment was overturned and the accused He was acquitted and sentenced. freedom immigration advocates from Mansehra lawyer