Find a Lawyer

BAKHSHA versus STATE

Sections 302, 324, 379, 109, 148 and 149 value the evidence, armed with a rifle and a gun, killing three people and injuring two others. The motive alleges that 13/14 years from the incident Earlier, the complainant's brothers had murdered the accused's real brother and this led to the conviction of the accused, after the trial of the trial, after acquitting the two accomplices. Went and sentenced the three accused to death, the accused claimed that the incident happened during the dark of night and that the attacker could not be identified by prosecution witnesses. Is. There was a previous rivalry between the parties and the accused in this case. Alibi's request was successfully established by two of the accomplices, and a strong determination was needed to guarantee the rest of the accused's conviction. After the legal proceedings, the FIR was delayed as the prosecution's witnesses were critically examined at the light source. The prosecution's witnesses, who gave different versions, tried to improve the timing of the incident, leading to the conclusion that the incident took place in the dark of the night, with the two accused, the victim and the injured eye witness Was charged with firing, successfully established his application. Before trial, Alibi can be relied upon by the statements of the prosecution witnesses in the presence of the remaining credible and independent independent evidence that the case lacked. Was abducted in the case. The extent of the litigation famous high court advocate from Eminabad lawyer