Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MAQSOOD SABIR ANSARI versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER, KASUR

Sections 2 (xxvi) and 152 (2) (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Maintains Election Controversy Applicants of the Questo Warranto Appeal Act apply with the District Returning Officer for a specific district return Papers were submitted for the specified seat for The officer simultaneously rejected the applicant's nomination on the basis that he was not a farmer high court, with constitutional jurisdiction, allowing the applicant to contest the election, resulting in the applicant subject to the constitutional decision. He was elected against a specific seat and after that he was elected Deputy Zalia Nazim Pila, whose petitioner raised that since he had an election petition pending before the Chief Election Commissioner, the present petition was also sought by the Punjab Local. Refer to the accuracy of section 152 (2) (b) of the Government. The ordinance, 2001, was applicable, no law was invested when it was rejected, the matter was taken seriously by the High Court before the election process, the relief given to the applicant depended on its own aking. It was reported that the High Court referred the matter to the Chief Election Commissioner, a constitutional jurisdiction was requested. The applicant himself, at this time, had no other remedy available to him at that time the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court was appropriate for the applicant, if such jurisdiction did not subsequently suit the High Court. Could not be allowed to work according to Someone who, with serious hands, approached the High Court in such a way as to ever go to the Constitution High Court. immigration advocates from Dir lawyer