Find a Lawyer

TAJ MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD ZAHOOR

In view of the validity of the decision on section 12 (2) and 115 of the invalid jurisdiction petitioner, the petitioner filed a takedown petition against the respondents in respect of the premises whereby his original owner About 1/4 of her death has been transferred to the late widow. The remaining resident went to the applicant's father because the suicide bomber stated that when the permanent transfer deadline was issued to the original owner, the foreclosure was in the interest of the respondents and he became a tenant, The applicant's father had failed to pay the rent in favor of his predecessor, and upon his death the respondents stated that the initial issue in the eviction proceeding was the relationship between the landlord and the tenant's side. Was about the existence of evidence. The rent controller and the appellate court simultaneously accepted the eviction request in which the landlord and the relationship existed, the tenant was established between the parties and since the tenant had not paid the rent, their dismissal The order was properly approved. Respondents filed a petition under Section 12 (2), CPC alleging that both the Rent Controller and the Appellate Court had acted without any jurisdiction, adding that the application was allowed by the Additional District Judge. The order to withdraw in favor of the petitioner was set aside, the petition for removal was directed to the applicant with the order of civil court to obtain his honor in connection with the house and the controller on the first. The Court of Appeal decided famous high court advocate from Warburton lawyer