Section 497 Preventive Regulation (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 148 and 149 bail, an FIR was immediately filed on the refusal of the case, in which the name of the accused was a special case of fireworks injury. Was done with the role. The lawyer for the accused says that during the interrogation it was implied that the accused did not take part in the incident, the record submitted by the lawyer of the state of the accused in the case was dismissed, which is below the court. Was admitted under bail, distinguished from the accused's case. During the interrogation, it was revealed that the co-accused had not taken any action in the incident and had given his co-accused only immunity to commit the crime, whereas the case against the accused was actively participated. That did not apply to the principles of consistency. There is no guarantee of bail in this case; the request for bail was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
