NASEER AHMAD versus STATE
Section 2 (2 (b) / re 34) Definition of Evidence Medical evidence did not confirm ocular testimony, but no source of light was mentioned in the FIR or throughout the prosecution's evidence to identify the accused Moonlight. The incident took place on the night of his presence, which was miles away from the victim's house, and the eyewitnesses were so contradicted by the evidence of witnesses coming out of their check and reaching the scene that none of the residents of the Dera incident. Didn't come forward. Support the prosecution case Prosecutor probable about his presence on the party's program and his presence He could not know, which happened in a remote area of his residence, could not be believed that after selecting the strange hour of the dark night, the accused, picked up by Lallakara for his purpose. Will expose you while the witnesses also attack the eyewitnesses. Their evidence did not mention the source of the light in which they recorded the accused's identity after a delay of three hours. The witnesses were concerned not only with the deceased, but also with the accused, and as such were interested witnesses, whose testimony from any other independent evidence No update was not recovered from the accused was not found guilty of the accused were acquitted in the criminal investigation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Alipur lawyer