Find a Lawyer

MST. SAKEENA MAI versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, HOME DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

Section 11 EEA Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition petitioner rejected the order passed by the Secretary of the Secretary under which the powers under Section 11 EE of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 The accused / detino was arrested and detained in the use of. The report merely presented a report of a district police officer and included a list of cases in which the Ditto / accused was involved. The law officer further stated that the unclean order was passed on the basis of secret reports of the agencies. Which could not be presented in court. The question about privileged documents is whether certain documents have a privilege, which can only be determined by the court, and not when the authority passes an immovable order relying on the documents, before detaining the authority. No suitable material was available, except that the district police officer's report and the list of cases in which the accused was found St. Dino had already submitted bond under Section 11 EE of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 And there was no material available on record that either Danto violated the aforesaid bond or that the bond There was no evidence that a fresh case was registered against him after the submission of the deed. It is also on record to say that Ditto was convicted in any alleged criminal case, the district police officer's report was based solely on arrests and that he was physically involved in any community activity or in any social activity. An incident of involvement was not disclosed. Section 11 EA of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 best law firm from Mastoi lawyer