SIKANDAR HAYAT versus STATE
Sections 2?2 (b) and 4 324 of the evidence were appreciated within the mansion of the incident The witnesses to the detention of the prosecutor's house were natural witnesses to the incident when the presence of the injured witness could not be immediately denied at the time of the incident. ? Details of the incident as well as the presence of the complainant were indicated on the spot. Ocular testimony was natural, cohesive, and reliable, supported by medical evidence; eyewitnesses had no reason to be involved in the suspect's involvement in the case. The motive for the incident was evidence of the defendant's innocence. Direct evidence was also corroborated by the FIR, the trigger and his felony proceedings, while the gunman went to the complainant's house and killed his mother-in-law, and his daughter was set on fire. Severe arm injuries also occurred. Complainant's remission in favor of conviction and sentencing of defendant does not exist
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Phagwar lawyer
