Find a Lawyer

MUNIR AHMAD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LODHRAN

Article 5, Schedule and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The Constitutional petition for the recovery of Dwyer's wife in her circle for the recovery of Dover claims that the husband had obtained four canal land as a dower husband at marriage. In his written statement, he refused to enforce the agreement in favor of his wife, but claimed that he had appreciated the evidence on record, following an agreement made by the Family Court to Dover. Has abandoned her claim, saying that the wife has proven her case against her husband through documentary documents. Along with the oral evidence, while the husband allegedly failed to produce a contract under which he allegedly waived his right to the Dwyer Family Court, however, it concluded that since the husband was not the owner of the land he owned, Therefore, the case filed by the wife cannot be decided. To the extent that the Family Court, after reviewing the land through Patwari, issued an order of Rs.100,000 in favor of the wife, administered by the appellate court, the husband said that the two courts below the husband. A constitutional petition has been filed against several decisions and orders, which could lead to conclusive conclusions of both courts on the basis of which evidence could not be identified as invalid or unreadable. The evidence was accepted on the basis of precise definitions and there was no illegal identification of any of the said judgments and no reference was made to the scope of the jurisdiction under which the fact of the facts of the courts was passed by the High Court. Cannot be interrupted / disturbed by Come how to become a advocate from Tarbela lawyer