Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MIANWALI AND OTHERS versus MEHMOOD-UL-HASSAN KHAN

Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 80 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Section 20 (c), 115 and O VII, R 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The reason for the dismissal proceedings was the civil court's territorial jurisdiction to recover the arrears of income, the recovery of the plaintiff, a contractor was declared to be the default district collector in the district in which the plaintiff was running the contract, so the land revenue arrears. The default amount recovery order has been passed by. The District Collector, where the plaintiff was residing, proceeded against the plaintiff on such an order that the plaintiff has taken charge of the recovery proceedings before the civil courts in his residence district, authorities said. S VI, R 11, was filed under CPC on the ground that there was no territorial jurisdiction due to the trial proceedings. The trial court granted the application and dismissed the trial under which the trial court. Did pass. y Lower Appellate Court but under the exercise of jurisdiction, the High Court set aside the orders under both the courts and directed the trial court to decide the case according to law as the plaintiff's residential district proceeded. The reason was partially born, therefore, the High Court was justified in rejecting the orders of the following courts, while exercising the powers under Section 115, the decision of the CPC presented by the High Court. Section 20 (c), was in accordance with the CPC and after the re-examination of the evidence on record, the Law High Court n Fixed it One final result is that his residence is in the Supreme Court District online advocate from Lawrence pur lawyer