ATHAR SAEED ANWAR versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SAHIWAL
RR 4 (1) (B) (V) and 7 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) for the applicant to charge sheet and investigate against them. Later, he was dismissed from the job under some charges. The inquiry against the applicant was done by a magistrate in accordance with the Punjab Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1999 and the applicant had a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The charges were later proved and the applicant was dismissed by the competent authority. The service tribunal also raised difficulties to examine the qualifying applicant's case, but dismissed his appeal. Investigations recorded from time to time by the service authorities as well as the service tribunal need not be dismissed by the Supreme Court without any unusual circumstances. Subject to any legal weakness of the law of public importance within the meaning of Article 1212 (3) of the Constitution, which guarantees interference with the Supreme Court Petition for leave of appeal for any appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
