Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH SHAHZAD ALIAS FAREED AHMED versus MIAN ABDUL MAJEED

O VII, R 26 and O XXII, R 3 (2) [as amended by the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972)] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188 Rules of the Supreme Court, 1980, O XXVI of the Supreme Court Review of the decision The legal heir predecessor was a defendant in the interest of the applicant in the unenforceable constitutional petition, whose application was passed at the hearing, because the applicant was not included in the respondents in this constitutional petition. The constitutional petition was decided after the deceased plaintiff had legal heirs, in the interest of the applicant against the legal heirs of the predecessor, the petitioner before the Supreme Court. The decision was taken, but the leave of appeal was denied on the ground that it was not the legal heir of the deceased plaintiff, who requested a review of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court on the basis that he was the respondent of the deceased respondent. Was the legal heir and was not enforced as a defendant in the Constitution Petition.In support of his petition, the applicant had filed special legal proceedings in his favor through all legal heirs, for civil reasons. Providing legal justification for the abolition of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, through the Law Reform Ordinance, 1972 He was removed for a long time, after which, after the death of any person during the litigation, he is automatically bound to make a judgment against his predecessor, even without restriction. The decision, passed on, will be binding on all of the deceased defendant's legal heirs, provided they are the legal heir applicant, the respondent's son, bound by such decision advocates from Peshawar lawyer