Find a Lawyer

NAZEER HUSSAIN CHACHAR versus DEPUTY POSTMASTER-GENERAL, SUKKUR REGION SUKKUR

Section 3 and 10 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Appellant dismissed from Section 4 for misconduct in the Public Service, who was previously dismissed for employment on charges of misappropriation of public money. An appeal was filed against him and the tribunal filed a remand on appropriate appeal. With the de novo inquiry instructing the authorities to give Appellant an appropriate opportunity to defend himself and to personally hear him, the authorities restored the appellant, but under the Tribunal's orders, De Novo's action Subsequently, the department appealed against the order of the appellant again. After receiving no response to the dismissal, the appellant filed an appeal before the service tribunal authorities failed to comply with the tribunal's preliminary decision under which the appeal was remanded because the inquiry stated Given that the authorities had, no witnesses were examined which would have denied the appellant's chances. Cross-examine any witness appellant The angels were convicted by the inquiry officer without any evidence, the order of dismissal of the appellant could not be retained, the impound order was set in this direction. Was that the applicant would be reinstated to the job with all the benefits returned. divorce advocates from Chowk Azam lawyer