Find a Lawyer

MRS. FARKHANDA TALAT versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS

Sections 3 (2) and 11 A government employee takes the form of a surplus, returning to the local post Civil servant was initially put into surplus pool acid Not adjusted to his salary and scale, despite the post not being The government employee was later transferred to another job The department sustained a state tribunal's accuracy against a lower position. An example was to allow such proceedings before the Supreme Court to be an equitable one. There was no availability of positions nor absence of any requirements with the Establishment Division for the equivalent position. The excuse offered by the Establishment Division was far from satisfactory. For example, the authorities' action could not be sustained in law because there was nothing available on the record that could have led the court to support There was no equivalent position available before. During the tenure of the Federal Government, the absence of public servants remained in the surplus pool. Such a substance, yes, the appointment of a public servant to the lower post was an unlawful and malicious exercise of powers and accordingly such a court. His appeal for leave to appeal and appeal was approved by the service tribunal and his notification was given aside the option to appoint public servants against the lower post, the authorities were instructed to go public Appoint the employee with the equivalent of the post which he has before applying for additional money. Be allowed. list of advocates from Toru lawyer