Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKHTAR versus STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 377 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Article 12 (a) Judicial Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Section 6 Law in Evidence (X of 1984), Article 21 Constitution In Pakistan (1973), Article 203F (2B), the burden of proof on the accused was last seen with the accused last time after his body was recovered, after which the trial court found guilty. And sentenced the accused to life imprisonment, which was upheld by the Federal Shariat Court. The plea offered by the accused was that without strong grip, a conviction and sentence could not be made on the basis of only the last evidence. Accuracy The last-seen evidence was rightly relied upon by the court that statements of the prosecution's witnesses could not be made. Has been excluded, which clearly indicates that the victim was last seen in the company of the accused by which the deceased was taken from his home on the pretext of peeling a Ugarkin baton recovery (weapon of crime). The man was found to have been stained with human blood and the medical evidence had fully confirmed the version of the prosecution, failing to present a convincing explanation that the accused could be charged at this location and from where he was detained. Can't commit The burden on them, in view of the provisions contained in Article 21 of the Convention of Martyrdom, was considered a 1984 defense version and the same was rejected by the lower courts of fact which came on record, the trial court's decision. Had approved. Interference was not guaranteed by the Federal Shariah Court as unthinkable immigration advocates from Saidu Sharif lawyer