CHAIRMAN, STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION, KARACHI versus ABDUL RASHEED SOOMRO
Article 212 (3) Principles of Reinstatement Consistency in Service Employees opted for voluntary retirement, but before any order was passed by the authorities, the employees withdrew their powers; the authorities challenged such order. Already enforced and retired the powers. By employees, employees were restored to employment The Judicial Service Tribunal was in accordance with the law requiring equality, fair play and fairness because in the previous appeals, employees were reinstated by the service tribunal. In order to be present in the service of existing employees, the same step should be accepted. Supreme Court refuses to interfere with leave to appeal appeal by service tribunal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
