Find a Lawyer

MST. NAHEED NUSRAT HASHMI versus SECRETARY, EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY), PUNJAB, LAHORE

R7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Detecting the Truth, Changing Discrimination by Departmental Powers After a Departmental Inquiry, the competent authority fined the time scale for two years and It also includes the recovery of a legal compensation service tribunal. In a four-year two-year increase, the appeal was dismissed by a time-scale reduction, but the fine was amended, but the loss was retained by the public servant, which was treated as discriminatory by the public servants. Because other government employees were justified. The competent authority had issued a show cause notice to the civil servant and provided them with a personal hearing in light of the inquiry officer's search and the recommendations of the service officer's tribunal had already changed it and amended the time scale reduction sentence. Was Similar charges were also leveled against other government employees with such charges for stopping the annual increase for four years along with the recovery, a government charge against a government employee was also proved at the department level. In the absence of any unusual circumstances, the Supreme Court had refused to replace its facts with the authorized forum. The decision passed by the service tribunal was not subject to any legal weakness to warrant interference by the Supreme Court. There was no specific question about the law of public importance as permission was allowed to appeal under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution. immigration advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer