Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus SHAMIM KHANUM

Article 12 to prove the agreement to execute evidence and to execute Article 72 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 113 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) and execute the uneducated female plaintiff. The specific performance of the contract to sell the contract to Ounce, 1961, whereby he sold all his rights to the compensation book (the Department of Settlement) in favor of the defendant in 30 4 1992. It was approved, while the case was filed on 30 9 1992, the trial was dismissed by the court. And the appellate court-approved ruling was rejected by the Supreme Court with jurisdiction to review. The plaintiff was obliged to disclose to the plaintiff that after the independent consultation the agreement was executed by the defendant while the record was proclaimed by the plaintiff during the purchase of the compensation book. The defendant should have been vigilant about the incident related to the issuance of the interim transfer order in favor of the defendant. From the date of the execution of the contract, on the date of the execution of the contract, on the 10th of 1963, the plaintiff had not filed a specific performance claim within a period of three years under Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the plaintiff even The case was not filed immediately after approval of the change in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff's conduct was not entitled to arbitrary relief in favor of him, after which the parties concerned had jurisdiction over the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such matters under Article 185 (3) of Article 185 of the Constitution. (3) was denied. Use your discretion in favor of the claimant as the powers conferred under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution patent advocate from Bisham lawyer